Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763311›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2023

Sex Differences in Electronic Cigarette Device Use Among College Students.

M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim, Diya Jacob, Samuel Stowe, Matthew Fifolt, Kristina M Zierold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J Ruzmyn VilcassimDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, UAB School of Public Health, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. ruzmyn@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3695-815X
Diya JacobSchool of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Samuel StoweDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, UAB School of Public Health, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Matthew FifoltDepartment of Health Policy and Organization, UAB School of Public Health, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Kristina M ZieroldDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, UAB School of Public Health, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Alabama Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarette use (vaping) has reached epidemic levels in the United States among teenagers and young adults. However, there is a paucity of studies that have examined the relationships between e-cigarette device types and user characteristics. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to characterize e-cigarette device use among a college population with a focus on sex differences in preferred vaping device. We employed a Qualtrics-based smartphone/online survey to gather responses on e-cigarette use; including device type, demographics and other related information during the period October 1, 2020 to January 30, 2022 in the Birmingham, AL metropolitan area. Participants were recruited via flyers with a QR code to the survey. The differences in e-cigarette device type used by the characteristics of the university e-cigarette users were assessed using either a Chi-square analysis or Fisher's Test. The magnitude of any association between the characteristics of the participants and vaping device used was analyzed via logistic regression. Out of 394 students who participated in the survey, 61 reported current exclusive e-cigarette use (15.5%) among our 18-24-year-old college student sample. Among vapers; more females reported use of Disposable e-cigarettes or Juul (pod-type) as their primary vaping device compared to males, who preferred Tanks and Mods + other rechargeable e-cigarettes (p < 0.05). Males also vaped more days per week compared to females. Vaping among young college students remains at concerning levels. The primary vaping device used significantly varies by the users' sex, making it an important factor to consider in future studies.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsStudentsUnited StatesYoung AdultCollege studentsElectronic cigarettesVaping devicesVaping prevalence

Identifiers

PMID36763311
OpenAlexW4319827559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.