ArticleNeurology and therapy2023
Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer's Disease: A Quantitative Analysis.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Meaningfulness of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: Data From the Randomized Phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Trial.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Trial
- Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease: results from the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 long-term extension.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects observed in EMERGE, a phase 3 trial of aducanumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Measures used to evaluate psychosocial interventions in dementia care: A narrative review and synthesis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- Priorities of people living with Alzheimer's and care partners: What Matters Most?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Target product profiles for treatments to delay or prevent symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Making outcome measures matter: Why should "what matters to people living with dementia" matter to dementia researchers?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Qualitative research and literature review support the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) content validity in early symptomatic AD.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Review
- Evaluating Elements of the Care Partner Experience in Individuals Who Care for People with Alzheimer's Disease Across the Severity Spectrum.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Understanding treatment goals and their application in clinical trial design for patients with Alzheimer disease and caregivers.Drugs in context · 2024Article
- Dementia Ideal Care: Ecosystem Map of Best Practices and Care Pathways Enhanced by Technology and Community.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Digital Health Technologies for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Initial Results from a Landscape Analysis and Community Collaborative Effort.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Review
- How do we put meaning into meaningful benefit? Perspectives from the lived experience.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- "What Matters" to Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: A Qualitative Pilot Study.Sage open agingArticle
- Measuring time saved in Alzheimer's disease: What is a meaningful slowing of progression?Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Assessing the clinical meaningfulness of slowing CDR-SB progression with disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Caregivers' Perspectives on Preventive Services for Medicare Beneficiaries with Cognitive Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data.Nursing economic$Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn this phase of the ongoing What Matters Most study series, designed to evaluate concepts that are meaningful to people affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD), we quantified the importance of symptoms, impacts, and outcomes of AD to people at risk for or with AD and care partners of people with AD.
methodsWe administered a web-based survey to individuals at risk for or with AD (Group 1: unimpaired cognition with evidence of AD pathology; Group 2: AD risk factors and subjective cognitive complaints/mild cognitive impairment; Group 3: mild AD) and to care partners of individuals with moderate AD (Group 4) or severe AD (Group 5). Respondents rated the importance of 42 symptoms, impacts, and outcomes on a scale ranging from 1 ("not at all important") to 5 ("extremely important").
resultsAmong the 274 respondents (70.4% female; 63.1% white), over half of patient respondents rated all 42 items as "very important" or "extremely important," while care partners rated fewer items as "very important" or "extremely important." Among the three patient groups, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating for any item was 3.4 (4.6), indicating that all items were at least moderately to very important. Among care partners of people with moderate or severe AD, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating was 2.1 (4.4), indicating that most items were rated as at least moderately important. Overall, taking medications correctly, not feeling down or depressed, and staying safe had the highest importance ratings among both patients and care partners, regardless of AD phase.
conclusionConcepts of importance to individuals affected by AD go beyond the common understanding of "cognition" or "function" alone, reflecting a desire to maintain independence, overall physical and mental health, emotional well-being, and safety. Preservation of these attributes may be key to understanding whether interventions deliver clinically meaningful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.