Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763285›Full record

ArticleInfection2023

Use and effectiveness of remdesivir for the treatment of patients with covid-19 using data from the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS): a multicentre cohort study.

Lisa Pilgram, Katharina S Appel, Maria M Ruethrich, Carolin E M Koll, Maria J G T Vehreschild, Susana M Nunes de Miranda, Martin Hower, Kerstin Hellwig, Frank Hanses, Kai Wille and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methylene blue for COVID-19 ARDS: insights from a randomized Clinical Trial.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Corticosteroids in COVID-19: pros and cons.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa Pilgram *Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. lisa.pilgram@charite.de.
Katharina S Appel *Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Maria M RuethrichDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Carolin E M KollFaculty of Medicine and Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany.
Maria J G T VehreschildDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Susana M Nunes de MirandaFaculty of Medicine and Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HowerDepartment of Pneumology, Infectiology, Internal Medicine and Intensive Care, Klinikum Dortmund GmbH, Hospital of University Witten/Herdecke, Dortmund, Germany.
Kerstin HellwigDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Frank HansesEmergency Department, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Kai WilleUniversity of Bochum, University Clinic for Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Palliative Care, Minden, Germany.
Martina HaselbergerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Hospital Passau, Passau, Germany.
Christoph D SpinnerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Juergen Vom DahlDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Maria Hilf GmbH Moenchengladbach, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Bernd HertensteinDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany.
Timm WesthoffDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Marien Hospital Herne Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
J Janne VehreschildFaculty of Medicine and Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany.
Björn-Erik Ole Jensen *Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Melanie Stecher *Faculty of Medicine and Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEFrankfurt Cancer Institute · DEJena University Hospital · DEKliniken Maria Hilf · DEKlinikum Bremen-Mitte · DEKlinikum Passau · DERuhr University Bochum · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe use of remdesivir (RDV) as the first drug approved for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial. Based on the Lean European Open Survey on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected patients (LEOSS), we aim to contribute timing-focused complementary real-world insights to its evaluation.

methodsSARS-CoV-2 infected patients between January 2020 and December 2021 treated with RDV were matched 1:1 to controls considering sociodemographics, comorbidities and clinical status. Multiple imputations were used to account for missing data. Effects on fatal outcome were estimated using uni- and multivariable Cox regression models.

resultsWe included 9,687 patients. For those starting RDV administration in the complicated phase, Cox regression for fatal outcome showed an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.59 (95%CI 0.41-0.83). Positive trends could be obtained for further scenarios: an aHR of 0.51 (95%CI 0.16-1.68) when RDV was initiated in uncomplicated and of 0.76 (95% CI 0.55-1.04) in a critical phase of disease. Patients receiving RDV with concomitant steroids exhibited a further reduction in aHR in both, the complicated (aHR 0.50, 95%CI 0.29-0.88) and critical phase (aHR 0.63, 95%CI 0.39-1.02).

conclusionOur study results elucidate that RDV use, in particular when initiated in the complicated phase and accompanied by steroids is associated with improved mortality. However, given the limitations of non-randomized trials in estimating the magnitude of the benefit of an intervention, further randomized trials focusing on the timing of therapy initiation seem warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsCohort StudiesCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirCOVID-19PandemicRemdesivirSARS-CoV-2Steroid

Identifiers

PMID36763285
PMCPMC9913009
OpenAlexW4319827792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.