ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2023
Remodeling and Restraining Lung Tissue Damage Through the Regulation of Respiratory Immune Responses.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative lobe-specific histomorphometric evaluation of pulmonary architecture, fibrosis, and alveolar macrophage distribution in swine raised under different management systems.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- New insights into the effects of PFOS exposure on rat lung development: morphological, functional, and single-cell sequencing analysis.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- C-Phycocyanin Prevents Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Lung Remodeling in an Ovalbumin-Induced Rat Asthma Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- miRNA-7145-cuedc2 axis controls hematopoiesis through JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Floating electrode-dielectric barrier discharge-based plasma promotes skin regeneration in a full-thickness skin defect mouse model.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- Tracking inflammation resolution signatures in lungs after SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.1 infection of K18-hACE2 mice.PloS one · 2024Article
- Relationship between Tissue Regeneration and Immune Modulation.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue damage caused by various stimuli under certain conditions, such as biological and environmental cues, can actively induce systemic and/or local immune responses. Therefore, understanding the immunological perspective would be critical to not only regulating homeostasis of organs and tissues but also to restrict and remodel their damage. Lungs serve as one of the key immunological organs, and thus, in the present article, we focus on the innate and adaptive immune systems involved in remodeling and engineering lung tissue. Innate immune cells are known to react immediately to damage. Macrophages, one of the most widely studied types of innate immune cells, are known to be involved in tissue damage and remodeling, while type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) have recently been revealed as an important cell type responsible for tissue remodeling. On the other hand, adaptive immune cells are also involved in damage control. In particular, resident memory T cells in the lung prevent prolonged disease that causes tissue damage. In this review, we first outlined the structure of the respiratory system with biological and environmental cues and the innate/adaptive immune responses in the lung. It is our hope that understanding an immunological perspective for tissue remodeling and damage control in the lung will be beneficial for stakeholders in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.