ArticleHuman cell2023
Three dimensional models of dedifferentiated liposarcoma cell lines: scaffold-based and scaffold-free approaches.
Article in Human cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumorigenesis of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: 12q amplicon architecture, oncogenic cargo, and evolutionary progression.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional models: from cell culture to Patient-Derived Organoid and its application to future liposarcoma research.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Comparison of three-dimensional cell culture techniques of dedifferentiated liposarcoma and their integration with future research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare malignancies, the number of reports is limited, and this rarity makes further research difficult even though liposarcoma is one of major sarcomas. 2D cell culture remains an important role in establishing basic tumor biology research, but its various shortcomings and limitations are still of concern, and it is now well-accepted that the behavior of 3D-cultured cells is more reflective of in vivo cellular responses compared to 2D models. This study aimed to establish 3D cell culture of liposarcomas using two different methods: scaffold-based (Matrigel extracellular matrix [ECM] scaffold method) and scaffold-free (Ultra-low attachment [ULA] plate). Lipo246, Lipo224 and Lipo863 cell lines were cultured, and distinctive differences in structures were observed in Matrigel 3D model: Lipo224 and Lipo863 formed spheroids, whereas Lipo246 grew radially without forming spheres. In ULA plate approaches, all cell lines formed spheroids, but Lipo224 and Lipo863 spheroids showed bigger size and looser aggregation than Lipo246. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks were obtained from all 3D models, confirming the spheroid structures. The expression of MDM2, Ki-67 positivity and MDM2 amplification were confirmed by IHC and DNAscope™, respectively. Protein and DNA were extracted from all samples and MDM2 upregulation was confirmed by western blot and qPCR analysis. After treatment with MDM2 inhibitor SAR405838, DDLPS spheroids demonstrated different sensitivity patterns from 2D models. Taken together, we believed that 3D models would have a possibility to provide us a new predictability of efficacy and toxicity, and considered as one important process in in vitro pre-clinical phase prior to moving forward to clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.