Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763257›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Digital midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany-acceptance of mothers].

Nicola H Bauer, Dagmar Hertle, Luisa Schumacher

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola H BauerInstitut für Hebammenwissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931, Köln, Deutschland. nicola.bauer1@uk-koeln.de.
Dagmar HertleBARMER Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung, Wuppertal, Deutschland.
Luisa SchumacherBereich Forschung/Beratung, Deutsches Krankenhausinstitut, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure outpatient midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic, digital midwifery services were enabled for the first time in Germany in March 2020. The aim of the survey "Digital midwifery care in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic" was to conduct an initial evaluation of the newly introduced digital services from the perspective of the midwives and the users. This publication presents the results of the mothers' survey.

methodIn February and March 2021, a cross-sectional study with an online survey was conducted. Women insured with BARMER who gave birth to a healthy child between May and November 2020 were surveyed anonymously throughout Germany using an exploratively developed online questionnaire on the utilization, satisfaction, and potential of digital midwifery care in pregnancy and the postpartum period.

resultsFeedback was provided by 1821 mothers. Around one third of the responding women had used digital midwifery services during pregnancy and/or the postpartum period and rated these services positively by over 80%. From the respondents' point of view, courses and counselling are very well suited whereas postpartum care often requires the midwife's presence. Advantages were seen in infection control and in saving time and travel.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has become a catalyst for digitalization in midwifery care. The digital services were quickly implemented by freelance midwives and well accepted by women and can usefully complement the care provided in the presence of the midwife. The opportunity to utilize and further develop these offers should be taken.

Indexed as

COVID-19MidwiferyChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMothersPandemicsPregnancyCovid-19 pandemicDigitalizationEvaluationMidwifery careMothers

Identifiers

PMID36763257
PMCPMC9912210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.