Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763237›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

A Qualitative Study of 11 World-Class Team-Sport Athletes' Experiences Answering Subjective Questionnaires: A Key Ingredient for 'Visible' Health and Performance Monitoring?

Alan McCall, Adrian Wolfberg, Andreas Ivarsson, Gregory Dupont, Amelie Larocque, Johann Bilsborough

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Alan McCallArsenal Performance and Research Team, Arsenal Football Club, London, UK. amccall@arsenal.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3780-8153
Adrian Wolfberg *Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-4017
Andreas Ivarsson *School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-5975
Gregory DupontSchool of Sport and Exercise, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-882X
Amelie LarocqueUniversity of Ottawa Law School, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Johann BilsboroughSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-5029
University of Technology Sydney · AUCase Western Reserve University · USLiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Agder · NOUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAthlete monitoring trends appear to be favouring objective over subjective measures. One reason of potentially several is that subjective monitoring affords athletes to give dishonest responses. Indeed, athletes have never been systematically researched to understand why they are honest or not.

objectiveBecause we do not know what motivates professional athletes to be honest or not when responding to subjective monitoring, our objective is to explore the motives for why the athlete may or may not respond honestly.

methodsA qualitative and phenomenological approach was used, interviewing 11 world-class team-sport athletes (five women, six men) about their experiences when asked to respond to subjective monitoring questionnaires. Interview transcripts were read in full and significant quotations/statements extracted. Meanings were formulated for each interviewees' story and assigned codes. Codes were reflected upon and labelled as categories, with similar categories grouped into an overall theme. Themes were examined, articulated, re-interpreted, re-formulated, and written as a thematic story, drawing on elements reported from different athletes creating a blended story, allowing readers a feel for what it is like to live the experience.

resultsOverall, four key themes emerged: (i) pursuit of the ideal-self, (ii) individual barriers to athlete engagement, (iii) social facilitators to athlete engagement; and (iv) feeling compassion from performance staff.

conclusionsOur main insight is that athletes' emotions play a major role in whether they respond honestly or not, with these emotions being driven at least in part by the performance staff asking the questions.

Indexed as

AthletesEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesTeam Sports

Identifiers

PMID36763237
PMCPMC10115681
OpenAlexW4319812057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.