Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763219›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2023

SICOB-endorsed national Delphi consensus on obesity treatment optimization: focus on diagnosis, pre-operative management, and weight regain/insufficient weight loss approach.

Marco Antonio Zappa, Angelo Iossa, Luca Busetto, Sonja Chiappetta, Francesco Greco, Marcello Lucchese, Fausta Micanti, Geltrude Mingrone, Giuseppe Navarra, Marco Raffaelli and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco Antonio Zappa *Director of General Surgery Unit, Asst Fatebenefratelli-Sacco Milan, Milan, Italy.
Angelo Iossa *Department of Medico Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Sapienza Polo Pontino, ICOT Hospital Latina, Latina, Italy. angelo.iossa@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6798-8100
Luca BusettoDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sonja ChiappettaObesity and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Department for General Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy.
Francesco GrecoDirector of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Istituto ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marcello LuccheseDirector of General and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital-Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Fausta MicantiUOC Psychiatric and Psychologic School of Medicine, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Geltrude MingroneUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe NavarraDepartment of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Marco RaffaelliU.O.C. of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and CREO, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Delphi Expert Panel
Maurizio De LucaDirector of General Surgery Unit Ospedali di Rovigo e di Trecenta, Trecenta, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOverweight and obesity affects 60% of adults causing more than 1.2 million deaths across world every year. Fight against involved different specialist figures and multiple are the approved weapons. Aim of the present survey endorsed by the Italian Society of Bariatric Surgery (SICOB) is to reach a national consensus on obesity treatment optimization through a Delphi process.

methodsEleven key opinion leaders (KOLs) identified 22 statements with a major need of clarification and debate. The explored pathways were: (1) Management of patient candidate to bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS); (2) Management of patient not eligible for BMS; (3) Management of patient with short-term (2 years) weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss (IWL); (4) Management of the patient with medium-term (5 years) WR; and (5) Association between drugs and BMS as WR prevention. The questionnaire was distributed to 65 national experts via an online platform with anonymized results.

results54 out of 65 invited panelists (83%) respond. Positive consensus was reached for 18/22 statements (82%); while, negative consensus (s20.4; s21.5) and no consensus (s11.5, s17) were reached for 2 statements, respectively (9%).

conclusionThe Delphi results underline the importance of first-line interdisciplinary management, with large pre-treatment examination, and establish a common opinion on how to properly manage post-operative IWL/WR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: Report of expert committees.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesityAdultDelphi TechniqueHumansWeight GainWeight LossInsufficient weight loss approachItalian Delphi consensusObesity pre-operative managementObesity treatmentWeight regain approach

Identifiers

PMID36763219
PMCPMC9918586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.