Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763170›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Does minimally invasive laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease live up to its expectations: a multi-center study with 226 patients.

Marjolein De Decker, Toon Sels, Sander Van Hoof, Quinten Smets, Tom Hendrickx, Els Van Dessel, Niels Komen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolein De DeckerDepartment of Abdominal, Pediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 566, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. marjolein.dedecker@student.uantwerpen.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-9704
Toon SelsDepartment of Abdominal, Pediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 566, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Sander Van HoofDepartment of Abdominal, Pediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 566, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Quinten SmetsDepartment of Abdominal, Pediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 566, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Tom HendrickxDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, AZ Turnhout, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium.
Els Van DesselDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, GZA Hospitals, 2018, Antwerp, Belgium.
Niels KomenDepartment of Abdominal, Pediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 566, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEAZ Turnhout · BEGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe minimally invasive character, the possibility to perform under local anesthesia, and the ease to repeat have led to increasing popularity of laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Hereby, potentially avoiding prolonged need for medical care at home, incapacity to work, and high expenses for patients and society. This retrospective, multi-center study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of laser-assisted treatment for pilonidal sinus disease.

methodsThe patient population is comprised of all patients undergoing laser-assisted treatment of pilonidal sinus disease at three Belgian hospitals between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were retrospectively collected. The primary endpoint was overall wound healing after one or more laser assisted procedures.

resultsA total of 226 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 129 days [7-1120]. The healing rate after one laser procedure was 78.8%. Some of these patients were healed by a second or third procedure adding up to an overall healing rate of 85.4% after one or more laser procedures. Wound infections were the main postoperative complication (8.0%) of which 5 patients required drainage (2.2%). For 29 patients (12.8%), laser-assisted treatment was insufficient, leading to a secondary operation (drainage, excision, or flap).

conclusionThis study shows that laser-assisted treatment is feasible for pilonidal sinus disease. The minimally invasive character of this technique might make up for a higher non-healing rate compared to other techniques like flap repair. However, care must be taken that healing rate might be related to the presentation of the sinus and expectations should be lowered as presumed high healing rates are not always achieved.

Indexed as

Pilonidal SinusHumansMotivationRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWound HealingHealingLaser-assisted treatmentMinimally invasivePilonidal sinus disease

Identifiers

PMID36763170
OpenAlexW4319827221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.