ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023
Modification of the Barrett Universal II formula by the combination of the actual total corneal power and virtual axial length.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Precision, Agreement, and Accuracy of Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Calculation of the total corneal astigmatism using the virtual cross cylinder method on the secondary principal plane of the cornea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of Barrett TK Universal II and Barrett Universal II TCRP Formulas in Power Calculations for 3 Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate whether a combination of the total corneal power (TCP) and virtual axial length (AL) based on Gaussian optics makes the refractive prediction accuracy of the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula better than the conventional anterior keratometry (K) and axial length.
methodsThe TCP and the virtual AL were calculated in two ways: the corneal index strategy and the TK index strategy. The former uses the corneal refractive index n
resultsIn the corneal index strategy, the FPI had the highest value at approximately n
conclusionThe combination of the actual TCP and the virtual AL based on Gaussian optics may lead to a better refractive prediction accuracy of the BUII formula than that of BUII-K.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36763168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.