Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763151›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Predictive factors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery.

Cristina Aguiar, Pedro Valente, Nuno Medeiros, Leandro Ribeiro, Nuno Lima, Pedro Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina AguiarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal. cristinaaguiar16@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-9565
Pedro ValenteDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno MedeirosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Leandro RibeiroDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno LimaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Pedro OliveiraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Rua Conceição Fernandes, S/N, 4434-502, Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) being the standard best treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), there still remains a high recurrence rate of nasal polyps after ESS. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of ESS in the treatment of CRSwNP and identify possible predictors for revision surgery.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with CRSwNP submitted to ESS between the years 2013 and 2021.

resultsWe analyzed 517 cases, of which 15.1% were submitted to revision ESS. The presence of hyposmia/anosmia, asthma, intolerance/allergy to non-steroid inflammatory drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease, and bilateral polyposis were more frequent in patients who needed revision surgery. Initial values of peripheral eosinophilia and Lund-Mackay scores were significantly higher in this sub-group of patients. Lund-Mackay score was the only independent risk factor for revision surgery.

conclusionsFactors like peripheral eosinophilia and Lund-Mackay score were associated with a higher probability of revision ESS. Applying these concepts to the clinical practice could help predict the evolution of patient's pathology in the post-operative period and identify in advance those cases that may need a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

EosinophiliaNasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesChronic rhinosinusitisEndoscopic sinus surgeryEosinophilsNasal polypsRevision sinus surgery

Identifiers

PMID36763151
OpenAlexW4319827750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.