Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36763136›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2024

Non-genetic physicians' knowledge, attitudes and behavior towards medical genetics.

Tea Mladenić, Martina Mavrinac, Sanja Dević Pavlić, Anna Malnar, Matea Matić, Sara Mikić, Saša Ostojić, Nina Pereza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The importance of genetic counselling for turner syndrome transition.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tea MladenićCenter for genetic education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Martina MavrinacDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Sanja Dević PavlićCenter for genetic education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Anna MalnarFaculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Matea MatićFaculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Sara MikićFaculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Saša OstojićCenter for genetic education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Nina PerezaCenter for genetic education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia. nina.pereza@medri.uniri.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6725-7618
University of Rijeka · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the knowledge, behavior, and attitudes toward medical genetics among obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and neurology residents and specialists, who encounter the highest number of patients with specific genetic disorders, in their everyday practice. The cross-sectional study involved 182 nongenetic residents and specialists in the Republic of Croatia, who completed a validated online questionnaire anonymously and voluntarily. The questionnaire consisted of five groups of questions: general information, knowledge, behavior in practice, attitude toward genetic testing, and additional education in medical genetics. The median score for overall knowledge of medical genetics was 70.2% among obstetrician-gynecologists, 80.5% among pediatricians, and 76.7% among neurologists (P < 0.001, lowest median in obstetrician-gynecologists). When asked about their behavior in daily practice, around 90% of respondents admitted the possibility of not recognizing patients with genetic disorders, which is why more than 90% emphasized the need for additional education in medical genetics. In addition, the respondents showed a positive attitude toward genetic testing, but they did not feel educated enough to interpret the results of genetic testing. The results highlight the need for further genetic education of non-genetic health professionals, which would lead to greater confidence and ability to recognize patients with genetic disorders, select the appropriate genetic testing method and achieve more efficient communication with patients.

Indexed as

Genetics, MedicalGynecologyObstetricsPhysiciansAttitude of Health PersonnelChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesGenetic literacyGenetics researchHuman behaviorHuman geneticsMedical education

Identifiers

PMID36763136
OpenAlexW4319826586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.