Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762784›Full record

ReviewJournal of breast cancer2023

Canine as a Comparative and Translational Model for Human Mammary Tumor.

Jee Young Kwon, Nicholas Moskwa, Wonyoung Kang, Timothy M Fan, Charles Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jee Young KwonThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-1682
Nicholas MoskwaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9819-9227
Wonyoung KangThe Jackson Laboratory, Sacramento, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-9987
Timothy M FanDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-7050
Charles LeeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA. Charles.Lee@jax.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7317-6662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the advances in research and treatment of human breast cancer, its incidence rate continues to increase by 0.5% per year, and the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies for specific subtypes of human breast cancer remains challenging. Traditional laboratory mouse models have contributed tremendously to human breast cancer research. However, mice do not develop tumors spontaneously; consequently, genetically engineered mouse models or patient-derived xenograft models are often relied upon for more sophisticated human breast cancer studies. Since human breast cancer develops spontaneously, there is a need for alternative, yet complementary, models that can better recapitulate the features of human breast cancer to better understand the molecular and clinical complexities of the disease in developing new therapeutic strategies. Canine mammary tumors are one such alternative model that share features with human breast cancer, including prevalence rate, subtype classification, treatment, and mutational profiles, all of which are described in this review.

Indexed as

Canine Mammary TumorCanine-Patient Derived XenograftCanine Somatic and Germline Mutation ProfilesComparative Oncology Model

Identifiers

PMID36762784
PMCPMC9981990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.