Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762471›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Mousepost 2.0, a major expansion of the resource.

Steven Timmermans, Jolien Vandewalle, Claude Libert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven TimmermansVIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5152-9620
Jolien VandewalleVIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Claude LibertVIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mousepost 1.0 online search tool, launched in 2017, allowed to search for variations in all protein-coding gene sequences of 36 sequenced mouse inbred strains, compared to the reference strain C57BL/6J, which could be linked to strain-specific phenotypes and modifier effects. Because recently these genome sequences have been significantly updated and sequences of 16 extra strains added by the Mouse Genomes Project, a profound update, correction and expansion of the Mousepost 1.0 database has been performed and is reported here. Moreover, we have added a new class of protein disturbing sequence polymorphisms (besides stop codon losses, stop codon gains, small insertions and deletions, and missense mutations), namely start codon mutations. The current version, Mousepost 2.0 (https://mousepost.be), therefore is a significantly updated and invaluable tool available to the community and is described here and foreseen by multiple examples.

Indexed as

GenomeMiceSoftwareAnimalsCodon, NonsenseCodon, TerminatorMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsMutationCodon, NonsenseCodon, Terminator

Identifiers

PMID36762471
PMCPMC9976886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.