Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762231›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2022

Benthic megafauna of the western Clarion-Clipperton Zone, Pacific Ocean.

Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras, Thomas G Dahlgren, Diva J Amon, Stephen Cairns, Regan Drennan, Jennifer M Durden, Marc P Eléaume, Andrew M Hosie, Antonina Kremenetskaia, Kirsty McQuaid and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Drifting in the abyss: an in-situ observation of swimming inMarine biodiversity : a journal of the Senckenberg Research Institute · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biodiversity data journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Guadalupe Bribiesca-ContrerasLife Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London, UK  Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8163-8724
Thomas G DahlgrenDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-2031
Diva J AmonSpeSeas, D'Abadie, Trinidad and Tobago SpeSeas D'Abadie Trinidad and Tobago.
Stephen CairnsDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-9271
Regan DrennanNational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-5464
Jennifer M DurdenUMR ISYEB, Départment Origines et Évolution, Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France National Oceanography Centre Southampton United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-9109
Marc P EléaumeCollections & Research, Western Australia Museum, Perth, Australia Départment Origines et Évolution, Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle Paris France.
Andrew M HosieShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Collections & Research, Western Australia Museum Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-662X
Antonina KremenetskaiaSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-3318
Kirsty McQuaidMuseums Victoria, Melbourne, Australia University of Plymouth Plymouth United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0395-8332
Timothy D O'HaraDepartment of Oceanography, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA Museums Victoria Melbourne Australia.
Muriel RaboneNational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8351-2313
Erik Simon-LledóUMR ISYEB, Départment Origines et Évolution, Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France National Oceanography Centre Southampton United Kingdom.
Craig R SmithSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-0889
Les WatlingSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, USA University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-1168
Helena WiklundDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8252-3504
Adrian G GloverNational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-074X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the exploitation of deep-sea mineral deposits, particularly on the abyssal seafloor of the central Pacific Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), which is rich in polymetallic nodules. In order to effectively manage potential exploitation activities, a thorough understanding of the biodiversity, community structure, species ranges, connectivity, and ecosystem functions across a range of scales is needed. The benthic megafauna plays an important role in the functioning of deep-sea ecosystems and represents an important component of the biodiversity. While megafaunal surveys using video and still images have provided insight into CCZ biodiversity, the collection of faunal samples is needed to confirm species identifications to accurately estimate species richness and species ranges, but faunal collections are very rarely carried out. Using a Remotely Operated Vehicle, 55 specimens of benthic megafauna were collected from seamounts and abyssal plains in three Areas of Particular Environmental Interest (APEI 1, APEI 4, and APEI 7) at 3100-5100 m depth in the western CCZ. Using both morphological and molecular evidence, 48 different morphotypes belonging to five phyla were found, only nine referrable to known species, and 39 species potentially new to science. This work highlights the need for detailed taxonomic studies incorporating genetic data, not only within the CCZ, but in other bathyal, abyssal, and hadal regions, as representative genetic reference libraries that could facilitate the generation of species inventories.

Indexed as

Biogeographydeep-sea miningDNA barcodingDNA taxonomymegafaunapolymetallic nodules

Identifiers

PMID36762231
PMCPMC9848802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.