ArticleGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2022
Comparison of hepatic steatosis index as noninvasive diagnostic tool and liver ultrasound for non-alcoholic steatosis in the adult population.
Article in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Metabolic Scoring Indices for Ultrasonographic Hepatic Steatosis: Development and Validation of a Novel Composite Score in 1204 Consecutive Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolic liver burden and osteoarthritis prevalence: A comparative analysis of noninvasive hepatic indices.Medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing the diagnostic performance of metabolic indices in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Nonlinear relationship between hepatic steatosis index and reversion to normal glucose regulation in Chinese adults with prediabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Positive and linear association of hepatic steatosis index with female infertility in US women: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Sex-specific relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and amyloid-β in cognitively unimpaired individuals.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate hepatic steatosis index (HSI) as a non-invasive tool in diagnosing and predicting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to compare it with abdominal ultrasound as the gold standard tool. Background: NAFLD is a general term attributed to the deposition of adipose tissue in the liver leading to hepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and also hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Rapid and valid screening can remarkably prevent the progression of this disease. Methods: A total of 464 people were included in the present study based on inclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated for body mass index (BMI), AST, ALT, and ALP indices. The liver echogenicity of patients was evaluated by abdominal ultrasound technique. Results: The results showed that out of 464 people included in the study, 32.33% represented fatty liver. It was found that 79.1% of patients were female. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age. Furthermore, it was found that ALT, AST, and ALP levels were significantly increased in the two groups of patients compared to the control group. It was determined that out of 150 patients, 75.3% were grade I and 24.7% were grade II NAFLD cases; no grade III cases were observed. The mean HSI for the NAFLD- group was 35.51±5.72 and for the NAFLD+ group was 42.84±5.70, a significant difference. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve also showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of HSI was 0.833 (95% CI, 0.796-0.870) for detecting NAFLD patients. At the cutoff point of > 36.0, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were 88.7% (95% CI, 82.5-92.5), 63.4% (95% CI, 57.9-68.5), 92.1%, and 53.6%, respectively. Pearson correlation showed a direct and significant correlation between ultrasound data and HSI values. Conclusion: Overall, the present study results showed that HSI as a non-invasive and non-imaging tool can diagnose NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.