Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762055›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination for patients with previously treated advanced primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a retrospective single-arm cohort study.

Qi-Hua Zou, Hui Liu, Cai-Wen Huang, Li-Ping Kang, Bo Qiu, Jian-Liang Mai, Yong-Bin Lin, Ying Liang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Progress in Immunotherapy for Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma Carcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qi-Hua Zou *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hui Liu *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Cai-Wen Huang *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Li-Ping KangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bo QiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jian-Liang MaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Bin LinState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ying LiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaSun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare and unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Studies reporting on salvage treatment for pretreated PLELC are limited. Positive interactions between gemcitabine (GEM) and capecitabine (CAP) have been demonstrated in preclinical studies. In addition, the clinical benefit of the combination has been reported for other malignancies. However, the efficacy and safety of the combination for pretreated PLELC remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the activity and safety of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM/CAP) combination for previously treated PLELC. Methods: Patients with PLELC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who received GEM combined with CAP between May 2013 and January 2021 as the second-line therapy or beyond were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous GEM (1,000 mg/m Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 5, 4, 4, and 3 patients treated with GEM/CAP combination as the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line settings, respectively. There were 8 patients with partial response (PR) (50.00%), 6 with stable disease (SD) (37.50%), 2 with progressive disease (PD) (12.50%), and none with complete response (CR). The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 50.00% and 87.50%, respectively. The most common hematological and nonhematological adverse events (AEs) at any grade were neutropenia (31.25%) and hand-foot syndrome (43.75%). At a median follow-up of 29.3 months with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 20.3 to 38.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 41.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-79.8 months). Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of GEM in combination with CAP for pretreated PLELC. Future multicenter large-scale, prospective studies are warranted.

Indexed as

capecitabinegemcitabinePrimary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC)salvage chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36762055
PMCPMC9903090
OpenAlexW4316467612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.