Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762020›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Driving time-based identification of gaps in specialised care coverage: An example of neuroinflammatory diseases in Germany.

Lars Masanneck, Saskia Räuber, Christina B Schroeter, Sophie Lehnerer, Tjalf Ziemssen, Tobias Ruck, Sven G Meuth, Marc Pawlitzki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Remote Monitoring in Myasthenia Gravis: Exploring Symptom Variability.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital Activity Markers in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digital Approaches for Myositis.Current rheumatology reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lars MasanneckDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-1415
Saskia RäuberDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-5572
Christina B SchroeterDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sophie LehnererDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-027X
Tjalf ZiemssenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Tobias RuckDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marc PawlitzkiDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Due to the growing complexity in monitoring and treatment of many disorders, disease-specific care and research networks offer patients certified healthcare. However, the networks' ability to provide health services close to patients' homes usually remains vague. Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) help to provide better care, especially if implemented in a targeted manner in regions undersupplied by specialised networks. Therefore, we used a car travel time-based isochrone approach to identify care gaps using the example of the neuroinflammation-focused German healthcare and research networks for multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), myositis and immune-mediated neuropathy. Methods: Excellence centres were mapped, and isochrones for 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes were calculated. The resulting geometric figures were aggregated and used to mask the global human settlement population grid 2019 to estimate German inhabitants that can reach centres within the given periods. Results: While 96.48% of Germans can drive to an MS-focused centre within one hour, coverage is lower for the rare disease networks for MG (48.3%), myositis (43.1%) and immune-mediated neuropathy (56.7%). Within 120 minutes, more than 80% of Germans can reach a centre of any network. Besides the generally worse covered rural regions such as North-Eastern Germany, the rare disease networks also show network-specific regional underrepresentation. Conclusion: An isochrone-based approach helps identify regions where specialised care is hard to reach, which might be especially troublesome in the case of an often disabled patient collective. Patient care could be improved by focusing deployments of disease-specific DHTs on these areas.

Indexed as

care accessconnected careDigital healthgeographymultiple sclerosismyasthenia gravismyositisneurologyremote patient monitoringspecialised care networks

Identifiers

PMID36762020
PMCPMC9903011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.