Phylogenomic assessment prompts recognition of the Serianthes clade and confirms the monophyly of

Else Demeulenaere, Tom Schils, J Gordon Burleigh, Jens J Ringelberg, Erik J M Koenen, Stefanie M Ickert-Bond

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification.PhytoKeys · 2024
Article
Precipitation is the main axis of tropical plant phylogenetic turnover across space and time.Science advances · 2023
Article
Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).PhytoKeys · 2022
Article
Phylogeny and classification of the Australasian and Indomalayan mimosoid legumesPhytoKeys · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Else DemeulenaereCenter for Island Sustainability, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, 96923, Guam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-3051

Tom SchilsCenter for Island Sustainability, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, 96923, Guam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-9082

J Gordon BurleighMarine Laboratory, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, 96923, Guam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-5136

Jens J RingelbergDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5210

Erik J M KoenenDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-4339

Stefanie M Ickert-BondEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Free University of Brussels, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, 50, CP 160/12 - B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-8898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific legume genus

Indexed as

Archidendron cladeFabaceaemimosoid clademonophylyphylogenomicstargeted enrichment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36762011

DOI10.3897/phytokeys.205.79144

PMCPMC9849021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.