Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762007›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2022

Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).

Jens J Ringelberg, Erik J M Koenen, João R Iganci, Luciano P de Queiroz, Daniel J Murphy, Myriam Gaudeul, Anne Bruneau, Melissa Luckow, Gwilym P Lewis, Colin E Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jens J RingelbergDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH 8008, Zurich, Switzerland University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5210
Erik J M KoenenDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH 8008, Zurich, Switzerland University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-4339
João R IganciInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Universitário Capão do Leão, Travessa André Dreyfus s/n, Capão do Leão 96010-900, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-3666
Luciano P de QueirozDepartamento Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Avenida Transnordestina s/n - Novo Horizonte, 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana Feira de Santana Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-0939
Daniel J MurphyRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-363X
Myriam GaudeulInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), MNHN-CNRS-SU-EPHE-UA, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 39, 75231 Paris, Cedex 05, France Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB) Paris France.
Anne BruneauInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale and Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke St E, Montreal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada Université de Montréal Montreal Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0796
Melissa LuckowSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, 215 Garden Avenue, Roberts Hall 260, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Cornell University Ithaca United States of America.
Gwilym P LewisAccelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK Accelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Richmond United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-4577
Colin E HughesDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH 8008, Zurich, Switzerland University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subfamily Caesalpinioideae with ca. 4,600 species in 152 genera is the second-largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) and forms an ecologically and economically important group of trees, shrubs and lianas with a pantropical distribution. Despite major advances in the last few decades towards aligning genera with clades across Caesalpinioideae, generic delimitation remains in a state of considerable flux, especially across the mimosoid clade. We test the monophyly of genera across Caesalpinioideae via phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes sequenced via targeted enrichment (Hybseq) for 420 species and 147 of the 152 genera currently recognised in the subfamily. We show that 22 genera are non-monophyletic or nested in other genera and that non-monophyly is concentrated in the mimosoid clade where ca. 25% of the 90 genera are found to be non-monophyletic. We suggest two main reasons for this pervasive generic non-monophyly: (i) extensive morphological homoplasy that we document here for a handful of important traits and, particularly, the repeated evolution of distinctive fruit types that were historically emphasised in delimiting genera and (ii) this is an artefact of the lack of pantropical taxonomic syntheses and sampling in previous phylogenies and the consequent failure to identify clades that span the Old World and New World or conversely amphi-Atlantic genera that are non-monophyletic, both of which are critical for delimiting genera across this large pantropical clade. Finally, we discuss taxon delimitation in the phylogenomic era and especially how assessing patterns of gene tree conflict can provide additional insights into generic delimitation. This new phylogenomic framework provides the foundations for a series of papers reclassifying genera that are presented here in

Indexed as

Fabaceaegeneric delimitationmimosoid clademonophylymorphological homoplasyphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID36762007
PMCPMC9848904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.