ArticlePhytoKeys2022
Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).
Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ceratonia siliqua: Phytochemistry, Bioactivity, and Its Emerging Role as a Sustainable Food and Industrial Resource.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- The complex interaction between mammalian herbivores, climate, soil and fire has shaped the evolution and distribution of plant spinescence across biogeographical realms.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Improved phylogenetic resolution within the Neotropical rainforest genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Rampant Reticulation in a Rapid Radiation of Tropical Trees-Insights from Inga (Fabaceae).Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Resolving relationships in the radiation of Australia's largest pea clade (Fabaceae tribe Mirbelieae) with target-capture sequencing.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth 1844 and related species within Caesalpinioideae.Genetica · 2025Article
- The Fabaceae in Northeastern Mexico (Subfamily Papilionoideae, Tribes Amorpheae, Brongniartieae, and Dalbergieae).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dispersed repeats and inverted repeat expansion drive major plastomic rearrangements inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of a woody invasive species,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Biome evolution in subfamily Cercidoideae (Leguminosae): a tropical arborescent clade with a relictual depauperate temperate lineage.Revista brasileira de botanica : Brazilian journal of botany · 2025Article
- Article
- The Fabaceae in Northeastern Mexico (Subfamilies Caesalpinioideae (Excluding Tribe Mimoseae), Cercidoideae, and Detarioideae).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structure, gene composition, divergence time and phylogeny analysis of the woody desert species Neltuma alba, Neltuma chilensis and Strombocarpa strombulifera.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- From forest to savanna and back to forest: Evolutionary history of the genus Dimorphandra (Fabaceae).Journal of plant research · 2024Article
- Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification.PhytoKeys · 2024Article
- Assembly, annotation and analysis of the chloroplast genome of the Algarrobo tree Neltuma pallida (subfamily: Caesalpinioideae).BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Precipitation is the main axis of tropical plant phylogenetic turnover across space and time.Science advances · 2023Article
- Revisiting the phylogeny and taxonomy of the Pithecellobium clade (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) with new generic circumscriptions.PhytoKeys · 2022Article
- On the taxonomic affinity ofPhytoKeys · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subfamily Caesalpinioideae with ca. 4,600 species in 152 genera is the second-largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) and forms an ecologically and economically important group of trees, shrubs and lianas with a pantropical distribution. Despite major advances in the last few decades towards aligning genera with clades across Caesalpinioideae, generic delimitation remains in a state of considerable flux, especially across the mimosoid clade. We test the monophyly of genera across Caesalpinioideae via phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes sequenced via targeted enrichment (Hybseq) for 420 species and 147 of the 152 genera currently recognised in the subfamily. We show that 22 genera are non-monophyletic or nested in other genera and that non-monophyly is concentrated in the mimosoid clade where ca. 25% of the 90 genera are found to be non-monophyletic. We suggest two main reasons for this pervasive generic non-monophyly: (i) extensive morphological homoplasy that we document here for a handful of important traits and, particularly, the repeated evolution of distinctive fruit types that were historically emphasised in delimiting genera and (ii) this is an artefact of the lack of pantropical taxonomic syntheses and sampling in previous phylogenies and the consequent failure to identify clades that span the Old World and New World or conversely amphi-Atlantic genera that are non-monophyletic, both of which are critical for delimiting genera across this large pantropical clade. Finally, we discuss taxon delimitation in the phylogenomic era and especially how assessing patterns of gene tree conflict can provide additional insights into generic delimitation. This new phylogenomic framework provides the foundations for a series of papers reclassifying genera that are presented here in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.