Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36762004›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2022

Disintegration of the genus

Colin E Hughes, Jens J Ringelberg, Gwilym P Lewis, Santiago A Catalano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Influence of seasonal humidity and nitrogen on soil ciliate and bacterial diversity beneath the canopy of Neltuma laevigata.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unraveling the invasiveness ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin E HughesDepartment of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland University of Zürich Zurich Switzerland.
Jens J RingelbergAccelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5210
Gwilym P LewisUnidad Ejecutora Lillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Fundación Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 251, 4000 S. M. de Tucumán, Argentina Accelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Richmond United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-4577
Santiago A CatalanoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 S. M. de Tucumán, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Fundacion Miguel Lillo S.M. de Tucuman Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-1365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust evidence from phylogenomic analyses of 997 nuclear genes has recently shown, beyond doubt, that the genus

Indexed as

AnonychiumFabaceaegeneric delimitationIndopiptadeniamonophylyNeltumaStrombocarpataxonomyXerocladia

Identifiers

PMID36762004
PMCPMC9849005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.