Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Alexandre G de LimaEscola Nacional de Botânica Tropical, Instituto de Pesquisas do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 2040, 22460-030, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil Instituto de Pesquisas do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-2507
Juliana de Paula-SouzaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Botânica/ CCB. Rua Eng. Agronômico Andrei Cristian Ferreira 216, 88040-535, Florianópolis/SC, Brazil Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianópolis Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-1634
Jens J RingelbergDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5210
Marcelo F SimonEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agopecuária (Embrapa) Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estação Biológica, Caixa Postal 02372, 70770-917, Brasília/DF, Brazil Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agopecuária Brasília Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-1716
Luciano P de QueirozUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Depto. de Ciências Biológicas. Av. Transnordestina s.n., Novo Horizonte, 44036-900, Feira de Santana/BA, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana Feira de Santana Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-0939
Leonardo M BorgesUniversidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Botânica, Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos/SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos São Carlos Brazil.
Vidal de F MansanoEscola Nacional de Botânica Tropical, Instituto de Pesquisas do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 2040, 22460-030, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil Instituto de Pesquisas do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-0744
Vinicius C SouzaUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Av. Pádua Dias 11, C.P. 09, 13418-900, Piracicaba/SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo Piracicaba Brazil.
Viviane R ScalonUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Herbário OUPR. Campus Morro do Cruzeiro s.n., 35400-000, Ouro Preto/MG, Brazil Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Ouro Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-6641
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
and fruit types (legumeeven in some of the less speciose genera such as the neotropical genus Stryphnodendron. This genus includes 35 species occurring from Nicaragua to Southern Brazil mostly in humid forests and savannas. Previous taxonomic studies of Stryphnodendron have highlighted morphologically distinct groups within the genusincluding the proposal of a lectotype for the single species in the genus. Gwilymiainflorescences (a simple or compound thyrse)LeguminosaeMicrolobiusNaiadendronNon-monophyly is a prominent issue in mimosoid legumesnucoid legume or follicle). Recent phylogenetic analyses have confirmed the non-monophyly of StryphnodendronParapiptadeniaPhylogenyPiptadenia groupPityrocarpaPseudopiptadeniarecognized by differences on leaves (number of pinnae and size of leaflets)supporting the recognition of three independent and morphologically well-delimited genera. Here we re-circumscribe Stryphnodendron and propose the two new genera Gwilymia and Naiadendron. In additionwe also provide an updated taxonomic account of the closely related genus Microlobius
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
New segregates from the Neotropical genus · full record | OpenQuestion