Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Analysis of living habit risk factors for esophageal cancer in central China: A bi-center case-control study.

Lingzhi Yuan, Peijun Shen, Shaopeng Zheng, Dongwen Wu, Xinmeng Li, Ting Cai, Yao Yao, Yunhe Song, Fen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lingzhi YuanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Peijun ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Shaopeng ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Dongwen WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xinmeng LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ting CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yao YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yunhe SongDepartment of thoracic surgery, Linzhou Esophageal Cancer Hospital, Linzhou, Henan, China.
Fen WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Central South University · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University · CNLinzhou Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer remains a public health problem in many countries, especially developing countries. The early lifestyle preventive measures mentioned in the treatment guidelines for esophageal cancer are very limited. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for esophageal cancer in a high-incidence area in China and to provide evidence for clinical intervention in esophageal cancer prevention. Methods: Symptom and lifestyle/habit questionnaires including 19 items were designed. The correlation between the occurrence of esophageal cancer and living habits was analyzed retrospectively through questionnaire survey. A total of 708 subjects (365 esophageal cancer, 343 non-esophageal cancer) enrolled from two hospitals in central China (Linzhou Esophageal Cancer Hospital and The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University) completed symptom and lifestyle/habit questionnaires. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with consideration of 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The composition ratio analysis showed that the top five lifestyle factors related to esophageal cancer were eating too fast, drinking, hot drinks, smoking and overeating. Univariate analysis showed that 15 factors, including male sex, smoking, drinking, eating too fast, overeating, hot drinks, greasy food, acidic food, hard food, strong tea, coffee, bedtime immediately after meals, eating food before bedtime, difficult defecation, and an overtight belt, were associated with esophageal cancer (all P <0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed, drinking (OR 3.609, 95%CI 2.223-5.859; P=0.000); hot drinks (OR 2.672, 95%CI 1.786-3.997; P=0.000); overeating (OR 2.110, 95%CI 1.411-3.154; P=0.000); eating too fast (OR 1.879, 95%CI 1.274-2.772; P=0.001); strong tea (OR 1.882, 95%CI 1.171~3.023; P=0.009); hard food (OR 1.723, 95%CI 1.113-2.667; P=0.015); smoking (OR 1.686, 95%CI 1.045-2.720; P=0.032), which were significantly associated with the development of esophageal cancer. Conclusion: The unhealthy lifestyles of patients in high-incidence areas of esophageal cancer in central China are significantly associated with the incidence of esophageal cancer. Lifestyle changes that address these factors, especially overeating and eating too fast, which are rarely studied or discussed despite being common, may improve esophageal cancer management and treatment outcomes. The present results may be used as a reference for preventive education and treatment.

Indexed as

dietary habitsesophageal cancerlifestylerisk factorstherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID36761963
PMCPMC9904202
OpenAlexW4317881846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.