Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761961›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Evaluation of flattening-filter-free and flattening filter dosimetric and radiobiological criteria for lung SBRT: A volume-based analysis.

Junxiang Wu, Hongchang Song, Jie Li, Bin Tang, Fan Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junxiang WuRadiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hongchang SongDepartment of Oncology, Xichang People's Hospital, Xichang, China.
Jie LiRadiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Bin TangRadiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Fan WuRadiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNXichang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams is becoming more prevalent in lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim in this study was to assess the impact of dosimetric and radiobiological differences between FFF and flattening filter (FF) beams for lung SBRT based on the target volume. Methods: A total of 198 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans with FFF beams and FF beams were retrospectively selected for this study. For all plans, the prescribed dose was 50 Gy/5 fractions, and the dose volume histogram (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung were recorded and compared. Moreover, monitor units (MUs), the beam on-time and the treatment time were evaluated. Results: The study was performed following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 and 0915 protocols. No significant differences in D Discussion: The FFF beam technique for lung SBRT with VMAT results in a better dose fall-off, better dose-sparing of OAR, lower NTCP of the lung and a shorter beam on-time compared with the FF beam technique. Additionally, the improvement in target and OAR-sparing for FFF beams was increased with increasing target volume.

Indexed as

FFF beamslung cancerNTCPSBRTVMAT

Identifiers

PMID36761961
PMCPMC9903338
OpenAlexW4317884363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.