Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761904›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2023

Noninvasive Evaluation of Lupus Nephritis Activity Using a Radiomics Machine Learning Model Based on Ultrasound.

Xiachuan Qin, Linlin Xia, Chao Zhu, Xiaomin Hu, Weihan Xiao, Xisheng Xie, Chaoxue Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiachuan Qin *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Linlin Xia *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Chao ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical university, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomin HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nan Chong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Weihan XiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nan Chong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xisheng XieDepartment of Nephrology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nan Chong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chaoxue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To explore whether ultrasonic radiomics extracted by machine learning method can noninvasively evaluate lupus nephritis (LN) activity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 149 patients with LN diagnosed by renal biopsy. They were divided into a training cohort (n=104) and a test cohort (n=45). Ultrasonic radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images, and the radiomics features were constructed. Furthermore, five machine learning algorithms were compared to evaluate LN activity. The performance of the binary classification model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The average AUC of the five machine learning models was 79.4, of which the MLP model was the best. The AUC of the training group was 89.1, with an accuracy of 81.7%, a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 80.7%, a negative predictive value of 85.2%, and a positive predictive value of 78%. The AUC of the test group was 82.2, the accuracy was 73.3%, the sensitivity was 78.9%, the specificity was 69.2%, the negative predictive value was 81.8%, and the positive predictive value was 65.2%. Conclusion: Machine learning classifier based on ultrasonic radiomics has high accuracy for LN activity. The model can be used to noninvasively detect the activity of LN and can be an effective tool to assist the clinical decision-making process.

Indexed as

activitylupus nephritismachine learningsystemic lupus erythematosusultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36761904
PMCPMC9904229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.