ArticleJournal of inflammation research2023
Noninvasive Evaluation of Lupus Nephritis Activity Using a Radiomics Machine Learning Model Based on Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a novel combined nomogram model integrating deep learning radiomics to diagnose IgA nephropathy clinically.Renal failure · 2023Trial
- Glomerulonephritis through the lens of ultrasound and radiology.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- A Deep Learning Radiomics Model based on Superb Microvascular Imaging for Non-Invasive Prediction of the Degree of Arteriolosclerosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Application Value of A Clinical Radiomic Nomogram for Identifying Diabetic Nephropathy and Nondiabetic Renal DiseaseCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning in lupus nephritis: bridging prediction models and clinical decision-making towards personalized nephrology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Noninvasive prediction of T-score in IgA nephropathy using machine learning within the Oxford classification system.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound contrast-enhanced radiomics model for preoperative prediction of the tumor grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Systemic lupus in the era of machine learning medicine.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Review
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model Based on Superb Microvascular Imaging for Non-Invasive Determination of Crescent Status of IgAN.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Renal fibrosis assessment in chronic kidney disease: Exploring varied kidney regions with ultrasound-based radiomics analysis.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To explore whether ultrasonic radiomics extracted by machine learning method can noninvasively evaluate lupus nephritis (LN) activity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 149 patients with LN diagnosed by renal biopsy. They were divided into a training cohort (n=104) and a test cohort (n=45). Ultrasonic radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images, and the radiomics features were constructed. Furthermore, five machine learning algorithms were compared to evaluate LN activity. The performance of the binary classification model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The average AUC of the five machine learning models was 79.4, of which the MLP model was the best. The AUC of the training group was 89.1, with an accuracy of 81.7%, a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 80.7%, a negative predictive value of 85.2%, and a positive predictive value of 78%. The AUC of the test group was 82.2, the accuracy was 73.3%, the sensitivity was 78.9%, the specificity was 69.2%, the negative predictive value was 81.8%, and the positive predictive value was 65.2%. Conclusion: Machine learning classifier based on ultrasonic radiomics has high accuracy for LN activity. The model can be used to noninvasively detect the activity of LN and can be an effective tool to assist the clinical decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.