Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Economically sustainable shade design for feedlot cattle.

Alex S C Maia, Gustavo A B Moura, Vinicius F C Fonsêca, Kifle G Gebremedhin, Hugo M Milan, Marcos Chiquitelli Neto, Bruno R Simão, Victor Paschoal Consentino Campanelli, Rodrigo Dias Lauritano Pacheco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Alex S C MaiaInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo A B MouraInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Vinicius F C FonsêcaInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Kifle G GebremedhinDepartment of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Hugo M MilanInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Marcos Chiquitelli NetoInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil.
Bruno R SimãoInnovation in Thermal Comfort and Animal Welfare (Inobio-Manera), Animal Biometeorology Laboratory, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Victor Paschoal Consentino CampanelliAgro-Pastoril Paschoal Campanelli, Research Center, Altair, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Dias Lauritano PachecoAgro-Pastoril Paschoal Campanelli, Research Center, Altair, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of shade reduces radiant heat load on feedlot cattle, thus reducing demand of water and energy for thermoregulation. While the positive effects of shade on animal welfare are widely known, the literature lacks data on the magnitude of its economic impacts. In this study, we propose the concept of novel shade design to prove that a correctly oriented and dimensioned roof structure, which optimizes shade to be displaced within the pens, motivates cattle to seek shade, protect them from short-wave solar radiation, and is resilient to counteract weather adverse conditions. The beneficial outcome is improvement in animal welfare and productive performance, as well as increments on financial return and sustainability. To attest these benefits, eight hundred

Indexed as

animal welfarecattleheat loadprofitabilityshadingsustainable intensification

Identifiers

PMID36761885
PMCPMC9905632
OpenAlexW4317931143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.