Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761814›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2022



Zhixi Fu, Xiaofeng Liu, Aiguo Zhen, Xinxin Zhu, Kamil Konowalik, Yueping Ma, Pan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhixi FuCollege of Life Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101 China.
Xiaofeng LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101 China.
Aiguo ZhenSustainable Development Research Center of Resources and Environment of Western Sichuan, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China.
Xinxin ZhuForesty Bureau of Yingshan County, Huanggang 421124 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-7453
Kamil KonowalikCollege of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-0608
Yueping MaDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław 5b, 51-631, Poland.
Pan LiCollege of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-7740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Chrysanthemumvestitumvar.latifolium and C.vestitumvar.vestitum were placed in different clades based on their chloroplast genomes and nuclear LFAFY gene sequences. Accordingly, based on previous morphological analysis, molecular phylogenetic results, fieldwork, and herbarium studies, Chrysanthemumvestitumvar.latifolium should be raised to the species level. Considering the condition of the material found and Articles 6.9, 6.11, 41.2, 58.1 of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (

Indexed as

AsteraceaeChinaChrysanthemum endemismtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID36761814
PMCPMC9849033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.