Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761811›Full record

ReviewComparative cytogenetics2022

A critical review on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae with updates on Indian taxa.

Biplab Kumar Bhowmick, Sumita Jha

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comparative cytogenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  2. Comparative cytogenetics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Biplab Kumar BhowmickDepartment of Botany, Scottish Church College, 1&3, Urquhart Square, Kolkata-700006, West Bengal, India Scottish Church College Kolkata India.
Sumita JhaPlant Cytogenetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700019, West Bengal, India University of Calcutta Kolkata India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-2768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytogenetic relationships in the species of Cucurbitaceae are becoming immensely important to answer questions pertaining to genome evolution. Here, a simplified and updated data resource on cytogenetics of Cucurbitaceae is presented on the basis of foundational parameters (basic, zygotic and gametic chromosome numbers, ploidy, genome size, karyotype) and molecular cytogenetics. We have revised and collated our own findings on seven agriculturally important Indian cucurbit species in a comparative account with the globally published reports. Chromosome count (of around 19% species) shows nearly three-fold differences while genome size (of nearly 5% species) shows 5.84-fold differences across the species. There is no significant correlation between chromosome numbers and nuclear genome sizes. The possible trend of evolution is discussed here based on molecular cytogenetics data, especially the types and distribution of nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). The review supersedes the scopes of general chromosome databases and invites scopes for continuous updates. The offline resource serves as an exclusive toolkit for research and breeding communities across the globe and also opens scope for future establishment of web-database on Cucurbitaceae cytogenetics.

Indexed as

chromosomegenome sizekaryotypeNORsploidy

Identifiers

PMID36761811
PMCPMC9849056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.