Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761652›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2022

Digitisation of the Natural History Museum's collection of

Krisztina Lohonya, Laurence Livermore, Jacek Wajer, Robyn Crowther, Elizabeth Devenish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krisztina LohonyaThe Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom The Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-8674
Laurence LivermoreThe Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom The Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-1842
Jacek WajerThe Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom The Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2329-9186
Robyn CrowtherThe Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom The Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-7496
Elizabeth DevenishThe Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom The Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1998-3804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2018, the Natural History Museum (NHMUK, herbarium code: BM) undertook a pilot digitisation project together with the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (project Lead) and the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh to collectively digitise non-type herbarium material of the subtribe Phaseolinae and the genera New information: We present the images and metadata for 11,222 NHMUK specimens. The metadata includes label transcription and georeferencing, along with summary data on geographic, taxonomic, collector and temporal coverage. We also provide timings and the methodology for our transcription and georeferencing protocols. Approximately 35% of specimens digitised were collected in ODA-listed countries, in tropical Africa, but also in South East Asia and South America.

Indexed as

crop wild relativescultivated beansDalbergiadigitisationgeoreferencingherbariaherbariumlegumesnatural history collectionsPhaseolinaePterocarpusrosewoodsspecimenssustainable timbertranscription

Identifiers

PMID36761652
PMCPMC9836434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.