Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761593›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2022

Two new

Yejie Lin, Shuqiang Li, Xin Zhao, Zhanqi Chen, Haifeng Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yejie LinHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang, China Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University Langfang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-2731
Shuqiang LiInstitute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5416
Xin ZhaoCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China.
Zhanqi ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China.
Haifeng ChenHebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang, China Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University Langfang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-3700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eresidae C. L. Koch, 1845 contains nine genera and 102 species, of which 24 species belong to New information: Two new species of

Indexed as

AsiadiagnosisDNA barcodestaxonomytype

Identifiers

PMID36761593
PMCPMC9836555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.