Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761482›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2023

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound synchronized with shear wave elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: a diagnostic test.

Huiling He, Xiaojin Wu, Meijuan Jiang, Zhikang Xu, Xuanxuan Zhang, Jianlian Pan, Xinyu Fu, Yunkai Luo, Jian Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huiling He *Department of Ultrasound Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Xiaojin Wu *Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Meijuan JiangZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhikang XuZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xuanxuan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Jianlian PanDepartment of Clinical and Research, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Xinyu FuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Yunkai LuoDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Zhejiang University · CNMindray (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies affecting women. Timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for treatment and prognosis. Some studies have found that elastography combined with microperfusion characteristics, which are mostly described by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), could help in the diagnosis of breast lesions. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS synchronized with shear wave elastography (SWE) in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions by using real-time contrast elastography images to analyze shell elasticity and contrast intensity. Methods: A total of 26 pathologically confirmed breast lesions in 26 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Each patient underwent conventional B-mode ultrasound, CEUS, and then SWE data was obtained from a frame of image that was almost identical to the B-mode and CEUS images when acquiring time to peak (TTP). Breast lesions were evaluated based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and quantitative characteristics that describe the stiffness and intensity of contrast of the 1.0-3.0 mm shell region. Quantitative aspects of the inner lesions and shell on the elastogram included the maximum (Emax), mean (Emean), and minimum (Emin) Young's moduli. Quantitative enhanced features included maximum (Imax) and mean (Imean) intensity. We took postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the 2 examination modalities, either alone or in combination. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 23 to 76 years, with a 42.5-year average age. In all breast lesions, 19 were benign and 7 were malignant. SWE synchronized with CEUS can effectively improve the diagnostic performance of breast lesions, and Emean + Imean and Emax + Emean + Imean of shell at 1.0 mm both had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67, 0.96], with the sensitivity and specificity of 71.43% and 89.47%, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of CEUS and SWE has a better diagnostic value in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions compared to separate techniques.

Indexed as

Breastcontrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)shear wave elastography (SWE)ultrasonography (US)

Identifiers

PMID36761482
PMCPMC9906099
OpenAlexW4316341607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.