Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761342›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2023

Rescue intracranial stenting for acute ischemic stroke after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

Junxiu Cai, Hai Xu, Rongzhou Xiao, Liping Hu, Ping Xu, Xianbin Guo, Yu Xie, Min Pan, Jie Tang, Qingtao Gong and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Determinants of day-1 stent patency following rescue intracranial stenting in failed intracranial thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junxiu CaiDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Hai XuDepartment of Neurology, Ziyang People's Hospital, Ziyang, China.
Rongzhou XiaoDepartment of Radiology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Liping HuDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Ping XuClinical Laboratory, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Xianbin GuoDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Yu XieDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Min PanDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Jie TangDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Qingtao GongDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Rong SuDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Jiahua DengDepartment of Neurology, Huili People's Hospital, Huili, China.
Li WangDepartment of Neurology, Zigong Third People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Zigong First People's Hospital · CNHuizhou Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intracranial rescue stenting (RS) might be an option for acute ischemic stroke after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, the findings were not consistent in previous systematic reviews, and whether the conclusion was supported by sufficient statistical power is unknown. Aim: To examine the effect of RS on acute ischemic stroke after the failure of MT with a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to 15 June 2022, without any language restriction. Studies assessing the effect of RS for acute ischemia stroke after MT failure were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies through the New Ottawa Scale (NOS). The primary outcome was the recanalization rate after RS. Secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months after stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality rate. We synthesized the data through a random-effects model and performed a TSA analysis. Results: We included 15 studies (containing 1,595 participants) after screening 3,934 records. The pooled recanalization rate for rescue stenting was 82% (95% CI 77-87%). Compared with non-stenting, rescue stenting was associated with a higher proportion of patients with 0-2 mRS score (OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.69-5.84, Conclusions: Our study showed that rescue stenting was effective and safe for patients with acute ischemia stroke who also had a failed MT, and this result was confirmed in a TSA analysis.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokemechanical thrombectomy failuremeta-analysisrescue stentingtrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID36761342
PMCPMC9905111
OpenAlexW4317910391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.