Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Mobile health solutions: An opportunity for rehabilitation in low- and middle income countries?

Bruno Bonnechère, Oyene Kossi, Jean Mapinduzi, Jules Panda, Aki Rintala, Susanne Guidetti, Annemie Spooren, Peter Feys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Are mobile health applications for traumatic dental injuries effective? A systematic review of their impact on diagnosis, prevention, management, and education.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mobile technologies for rehabilitation in non-specific spinal disorders: a systematic review of the efficacy and potential for implementation in low- and middle-income countries.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Bruno BonnechèreREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Oyene KossiREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Jean MapinduziREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Jules PandaUniversity of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Aki RintalaREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Susanne GuidettiDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division for Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annemie SpoorenREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Peter FeysREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University (UHasselt), Hasselt, Belgium.
Hasselt University · BEKarolinska Institutet · SEMinistère de la Santé Publique · BIUniversité de Parakou · BJUniversity of Lubumbashi · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) development has advanced rapidly, indicating promise as an effective patient intervention. mHealth has many potential benefits that could help the treatment of patients, and the development of rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). mHealth is a low-cost option that does not need rapid access to healthcare clinics or employees. It increases the feasibility and rationality of clinical treatment expectations in comparison to the conventional clinical model of management by promoting patient adherence to the treatment plan. mHealth can also serve as a basis for formulating treatment plans and partially compensate for the shortcomings of the traditional model. In addition, mHealth can help achieve universal rehabilitation service coverage by overcoming geographical barriers, thereby increasing the number of ways patients can benefit from the rehabilitation service, and by providing rehabilitation to individuals in remote areas and communities with insufficient healthcare services. However, despite these positive potential aspects, there is currently only a very limited number of studies performed in LMICs using mHealth. In this study, we first reviewed the current evidence supporting the use of mHealth in rehabilitation to identify the countries where studies have been carried out. Then, we identify the current limitations of the implementation of such mHealth solutions and propose a 10-point action plan, focusing on the macro (e.g., policymakers), meso (e.g., technology and healthcare institutions), and micro (e.g., patients and relatives) levels to ease the use, validation, and implementation in LMICs and thus participate in the development and recognition of public health and rehabilitation in these countries.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesTelemedicineHealth ServicesHumansPatient CompliancePublic HealthcaremHealthpublic healthrehabilitationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36761328
PMCPMC9902940
OpenAlexW4317821225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.