Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761323›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Sputum smears quality inspection using an ensemble feature extraction approach.

Amarech Kiflie, Guta Tesema Tufa, Ayodeji Olalekan Salau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amarech KiflieFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Arba Minch Institute of Technology, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Guta Tesema TufaFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Arba Minch Institute of Technology, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Ayodeji Olalekan SalauDepartment of Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is extremely important. Sputum smear microscopy is thought to be the best method available in terms of accessibility and ease of use in resource-constrained countries. In this paper, research was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnosis by examining, among other things, the underlying causes of sputum smear quality for Ethiopian states such as Tigray, Amahira, and Oromia. However, because it is done manually, it has its limitations. This study proposes a model for sputum smear quality inspection using an ensemble feature extraction approach. The dataset used was recorded and labeled by experts in a regional lab in Bahir Dar, near Felege Hiwot Hospital after being collected from Gabi Hospital, Felege Hiwot Hospital, Adit Clinic and Gondar Hospital, as well as Kidanemihret Clinic in Gondar. We used a controlled environment to reduce environmental influences and eliminate variation. All the data was collected using a smartphone (the standard 15) with a jpg file extension and a pixel resolution of 1,728 × 3,840. Prior to feature extraction, bicubic resizing, and ROI extraction using thresholding was performed. In addition, sequential Gaussian and Gabor filters were used for noise reduction, augmentation, and CLAHE was used for enhancement. For feature extraction, GLCM from the gray label and CNN from the color image were both chosen. Ultimately, when CNN, SVM, and KNN classifiers were used to test both CNN and GLCM features, KNN outperformed them all with scores of 87, 93, and 94% for GLCM, CNN, and a hybrid of CNN and GLCM, respectively. CNN with GLCM outperformed other methods by 0.7 and 0.1% for GLCM and CNN feature extractors using the same classifier, respectively. In addition, the KNN classifier with the combination of CNN and GLCM as feature extractors performed better than existing methods by 1.48%.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedSputumTuberculosisHumansCNNfeature extractionGLCMKNNsputum smear inspection

Identifiers

PMID36761323
PMCPMC9905811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.