Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761321›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Arizona Surge Line: An emergent statewide COVID-19 transfer service with equity as an outcome.

Lisa Villarroel, Erin Tams, Luke Smith, Jessica Rigler, Dena Wilson, Chengcheng Hu, Marilyn K Glassberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patients refusing a permanent colostomy for rectal cancer: clinical outcome and psychological aspects.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa VillarroelDivision of Public Health Preparedness, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Erin TamsDivision of Public Health Preparedness, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Luke SmithDivision of Public Health Preparedness, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Jessica RiglerDivision of Public Health Preparedness, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Dena WilsonPhoenix Area Indian Health Service, Indian Health Service, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Chengcheng HuEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Marilyn K GlassbergMedicine/Pulmonary, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Arizona Surge Line was an emergent initiative during the COVID-19 pandemic to facilitate COVID-19 patient transfers and load-level hospitals on a statewide level. It was designed and implemented by the Arizona Department of Health Services in preparation for the first hospital surge due to COVID-19, recognizing the disproportionate impact that hospital surge would have on rural and tribal populations. Methods: We analyzed the Arizona Surge Line transfer data for the state's first two COVID-19 surges (4/16/2020-3/6/2021). Transfer data included transfer request characteristics, patient demographics and participating hospital characteristics. When applicable, we compared this data with Arizona census data, COVID-19 case data, and the CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index. The primary outcomes studied were the proportion of COVID-19 patient requests being successfully transferred, the median transfer time, and the proportion of vulnerable populations impacted. Results: During the period of study, 160 hospitals in Arizona made 6,732 requests for transfer of COVID-19 patients. The majority of these patients (84%, 95% CI: 83-85%) were placed successfully with a median transfer time of 59 min (inter-quartile range 33-116). Of all transfer requests, 58% originated from rural hospitals, 53% were for patients of American Indian/Alaska Native ethnicity, and 73% of patients originated from highly vulnerable areas. The majority (98%) of receiving facilities were in urban areas. The Arizona Surge Line matched the number of transfers with licensed market shares during the period of study. Conclusions: The Arizona Surge Line is an equity-enhancing initiative that disproportionately benefited vulnerable populations. This statewide transfer infrastructure could become a standard public health mechanism to manage hospital surges and enhance access to care during a health emergency.

Indexed as

COVID-19ArizonaHumansPandemicsUnited Statesaccess to careCOVIDequityload-levelingsurgetransfer center

Identifiers

PMID36761321
PMCPMC9907843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.