Article in MycoKeys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Guiheng ZhengKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.
Minqi YouAgriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of Huangyan District, Taizhou City 318020, China Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of Huangyan District Zhejiang China.
Xuening LiResearch Institute of Desertification, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Research Institute of Desertification, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.
Qinzheng ZhouKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.
Zheng WangKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.
Huimin WangKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.
Quan LuKey Laboratory of Forest Protection, National Forestry and Grassland Administration; Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-2677
Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection · CNDepartment Of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Of Jiangxi Province · CNInstitute of Desertification Studies · CN
Funding
DNA SAMPLE ANALYSIS27307C2007 · NIEHS · PI LEHMAN, TERESA · 2007 to 2007
$74k
NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C2007
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Ceratocystiopsisfungal successionGraphilbumOphiostomapine wilt diseaseSporothrixtwo new species
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Diversity of fungi associated with · full record | OpenQuestion