Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Changes in epicardial and visceral adipose tissue depots following bariatric surgery and their effect on cardiac geometry.

J A Henry, I Abdesselam, O Deal, A J Lewis, J Rayner, M Bernard, A Dutour, B Gaborit, F Kober, A Soghomonian and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Epicardial adipose tissue in coronary microvascular disease.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The effect of bariatric surgery type on cardiac reverse remodelling.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

J A HenryOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
I AbdesselamOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
O DealOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
A J LewisOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J RaynerOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
M BernardAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.
A DutourAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Marseille, France.
B GaboritAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Marseille, France.
F KoberAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.
A SoghomonianAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Marseille, France.
B SgromoDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J ByrneDivision of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
T BegeAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
S NeubauerOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
B A BorlaugDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
O J RiderOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRChurchill Hospital · GBMayo Clinic · USUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/70/32157British Heart Foundation PG/2019/34842Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity affects cardiac geometry, causing both eccentric (due to increased cardiac output) and concentric (due to insulin resistance) remodelling. Following bariatric surgery, reversal of both processes should occur. Furthermore, epicardial adipose tissue loss following bariatric surgery may reduce pericardial restraint, allowing further chamber expansion. We investigated these changes in a serial imaging study of adipose depots and cardiac geometry following bariatric surgery. Methods: 62 patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) before and after bariatric surgery, including 36 with short-term (median 212 days), 37 medium-term (median 428 days) and 32 long-term (median 1030 days) follow-up. CMR was used to assess cardiac geometry (left atrial volume (LAV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)), LV mass (LVM) and LV eccentricity index (LVei - a marker of pericardial restraint). Abdominal visceral (VAT) and epicardial (EAT) adipose tissue were also measured. Results: Patients on average had lost 21kg (38.9% excess weight loss, EWL) at 212 days and 36kg (64.7% EWL) at 1030 days following bariatric surgery. Most VAT and EAT loss (43% and 14%, p<0.0001) occurred within the first 212 days, with non-significant reductions thereafter. In the short-term LVM (7.4%), LVEDV (8.6%) and LAV (13%) all decreased (all p<0.0001), with change in cardiac output correlated with LVEDV (r=0.35,p=0.03) and LAV change (r=0.37,p=0.03). Whereas LVM continued to decrease with time (12% decrease relative to baseline at 1030 days, p<0.0001), both LAV and LVEDV had returned to baseline by 1030 days. LV mass:volume ratio (a marker of concentric hypertrophy) reached its nadir at the longest timepoint (p<0.001). At baseline, LVei correlated with baseline EAT (r=0.37,p=0.0040), and decreased significantly from 1.09 at baseline to a low of 1.04 at 428 days (p<0.0001). Furthermore, change in EAT following bariatric surgery correlated with change in LVei (r=0.43,p=0.0007). Conclusions: Cardiac volumes show a biphasic response to weight loss, initially becoming smaller and then returning to pre-operative sizes by 1030 days. We propose this is due to an initial reversal of eccentric remodelling followed by reversal of concentric remodelling. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a role of EAT contributing to pericardial restraint, with EAT loss improving markers of pericardial restraint.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryIntra-Abdominal FatHumansObesityPericardiumWeight Lossbariatric surgerycardiac geometrycardiac remodellingepicardiac adipose tissueobesityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID36761185
PMCPMC9905224
OpenAlexW4318045011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.