Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36761079›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2023

DNA barcoding as a tool to monitor the diversity of endangered spring snails in an Austrian National Park.

Hannah C Schubert, Michael Duda, Anita Eschner, Erich Weigand, Luise Kruckenhauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah C SchubertCentral Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria Central Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum Vienna Austria.
Michael DudaCentral Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria Central Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum Vienna Austria.
Anita Eschner3rd Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria 3rd Zoological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5491-3951
Erich WeigandNationalpark OÖ Kalkalpen Ges.m.b.H., Molln, Austria Nationalpark OÖ Kalkalpen Ges.m.b.H. Molln Austria.
Luise KruckenhauserCentral Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria Central Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-4347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Kalkalpen National Park is situated in Upper Austria and contains more than 800 springs. The international importance of this Park is, from the perspective of nature conservation directives, highly significant (European Nature Reserve Natura 2000, recognised wetland of the Ramsar convention). In the current study, the hydrobioid fauna ('spring snails') of the Kalkalpen National Park was evaluated. These tiny snails are difficult to determine; however, their investigation is especially desirable, as several species are threatened and as they are important for water quality assessment. Snails collected in 39 selected springs were examined with classical morphological methods (shell and genital anatomy) and, subsequently, by DNA analysis. For this task, the DNA barcode, a partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene (length of the sequence 658-682 bp), was PCR amplified and sequenced. From 107 specimens, the DNA barcoding sequence could be obtained and compared with already existing DNA sequences. The (sub)endemic species

Indexed as

COIDNA barcodingHydrobioidsnational parksspecies delimitationspring snails

Identifiers

PMID36761079
PMCPMC9850253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.