Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760792›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022

A systematic review with meta-analysis: Traditional Chinese tuina therapy for insomnia.

Zheng Wang, Hui Xu, Hang Zhou, Yang Lei, Lulu Yang, Juan Guo, Yuxia Wang, Yunfeng Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng WangCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Hui XuCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Hang ZhouCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yang LeiCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Lulu YangCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Juan GuoCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuxia WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Yunfeng ZhouCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHenan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With changes in the way of life and work, an increasing number of people are suffering from insomnia. In China, a traditional Chinese medicine method tuina is widely used for the treatment of insomnia. However, the evidence for tuina therapy for insomnia remains controversial. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of tuina therapy on the symptoms of patients with primary insomnia. Methods: From establishment to January 2022, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using seven electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials of tuina therapy for insomnia. We used RevMan 5.4 software and the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool to evaluate the quality of the included randomized controlled trials and perform the meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the different intervention methods. The I2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity. Results: Eighteen studies conducted from 2011 to 2021 were included, with a total of 1,471 patients. In terms of efficacy, tuina alone was superior to other treatments [odds ratio (OR), 3.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.15, 5.55; Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that tuina can significantly improve the clinical efficacy and sleep quality of patients with primary insomnia. This study provides a theoretical basis and treatment guidance for patients with primary insomnia. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022355742.

Indexed as

effective rateinsomniameta-analysisPittsburgh Sleep Quality Scalerandomized controlled trialtuina

Identifiers

PMID36760792
PMCPMC9905798
OpenAlexW4317930713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.