Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Evaluation of the efficacy of the antimicrobial peptide HJH-3 in chickens infected with

Yanzhao Xu, Qing Wang, Mengmeng Dong, Huishuai Song, Bolin Hang, Yawei Sun, Huihui Zhang, Jianhe Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Antibiotic Alternatives and Next-Generation Therapeutics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The probioticInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Gallnut tannic acid alleviates gut damage induced byFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanzhao XuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Qing WangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Mengmeng DongCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Huishuai SongCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Bolin HangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Yawei SunCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Huihui ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Jianhe HuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China.
Henan Institute of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a promising substitute for antibiotics, increasing attention has been given to the clinical application of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). In this study, the mode of action of the HJH-3 against

Indexed as

antibiotic substitutesantimicrobial peptide (AMP)application effectiveness evaluationHJH-3Salmonella Pullorum

Identifiers

PMID36760504
PMCPMC9904387
OpenAlexW4317815075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.