Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760456›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

In no uncertain terms: Group cohesion did not affect exploration and group decision making under low uncertainty.

Marie Ritter, Johannes Pritz, Lara Morscheck, Emma Baumann, Margarete Boos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie RitterSocial and Communication Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes PritzSocial and Communication Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Lara MorscheckSocial and Communication Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Emma BaumannSocial and Communication Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Margarete BoosSocial and Communication Psychology, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute for Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group decision making under uncertainty often requires groups to balance exploration of their environment with exploitation of the seemingly best option. In order to succeed at this collective induction, groups need to merge the knowledge of all group members and combine goal-oriented and social motivations (i.e., group cohesion). This paper presents three studies that investigate whether more cohesive groups perform worse at collective induction tasks as they spend less time exploring possible options. Study 1 simulates group decision making with the ε-greedy algorithm in order to identify suitable manipulations of group cohesion and investigate how differing exploration lengths can affect outcomes of group decisions. Study 2 (

Indexed as

collective inductionexplorationgroup cohesiongroup decision makingHoneyComb paradigmleadershipuncertaintyε-greedy

Identifiers

PMID36760456
PMCPMC9905233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.