Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760292›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2023

Adsorptive removal of antibiotic pollutants from wastewater using biomass/biochar-based adsorbents.

Oluwaseyi Aderemi Ajala, Solomon Oluwaseun Akinnawo, Abayomi Bamisaye, Demilade Tunrayo Adedipe, Morenike Oluwabunmi Adesina, Omolabake Abiodun Okon-Akan, Tosin Adewumi Adebusuyi, Adedamola Titi Ojedokun, Kayode Adesina Adegoke, Olugbenga Solomon Bello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent progresses in synthesis and modification of g-CWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Oluwaseyi Aderemi AjalaDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University 1-4-1, Kagamiyama Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527 Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5441-6587
Solomon Oluwaseun AkinnawoDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology P. M. B. 4000 Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-465X
Abayomi BamisayeDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Lead City University Ibadan Oyo State Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-9058
Demilade Tunrayo AdedipeState Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution and Department of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong Tat Chee Avenue Kowloon Hong Kong SAR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-216X
Morenike Oluwabunmi AdesinaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Lead City University Ibadan Oyo State Nigeria.
Omolabake Abiodun Okon-AkanDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology P. M. B. 4000 Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria.
Tosin Adewumi AdebusuyiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Augustine University, Ilara-Epe Lagos State Nigeria kwharyourday@gmail.com osbello@lautech.edu.ng.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-6107
Adedamola Titi OjedokunDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology P. M. B. 4000 Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria.
Kayode Adesina AdegokeDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology P. M. B. 4000 Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-0132
Olugbenga Solomon BelloDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology P. M. B. 4000 Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-1816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores adsorptive removal measures to shed light on current water treatment innovations for kinetic/isotherm models and their applications to antibiotic pollutants using a broad range of biomass-based adsorbents. The structure, classifications, sources, distribution, and different techniques for the remediation of antibiotics are discussed. Unlike previous studies, a wide range of adsorbents are covered and adsorption of comprehensive classes of antibiotics onto biomass/biochar-based adsorbents are categorized as β-lactam, fluoroquinolone, sulfonamide, tetracycline, macrolides, chloramphenicol, antiseptic additives, glycosamides, reductase inhibitors, and multiple antibiotic systems. This allows for an assessment of their performance and an understanding of current research breakthroughs in applying various adsorbent materials for antibiotic removal. Distinct from other studies in the field, the theoretical basis of different isotherm and kinetics models and the corresponding experimental insights into their applications to antibiotics are discussed extensively, thereby identifying the associated strengths, limitations, and efficacy of kinetics and isotherms for describing the performances of the adsorbents. In addition, we explore the regeneration of adsorbents and the potential applications of the adsorbents in engineering. Lastly, scholars will be able to grasp the present resources employed and the future necessities for antibiotic wastewater remediation.

Identifiers

PMID36760292
PMCPMC9897205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.