Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760105›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Increasing Identification and Follow-Up of Older Adult Depression in Primary Care.

Keirstin E Uomoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keirstin E UomotoMount Saint Mary's University, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-2847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is a common mental health disorder faced by older adults that can go undetected and untreated. It was determined that the project site was not screening for depression among their older patient population. Aims: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine if the implementation of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) would impact the identification of risk factors for depression and follow-up among adults 65 and older.

methodsImplementation started in June 2021 in a primary care office in Southern California. Data was collected for this project over a total of 8 weeks. This project was a quality improvement project designed to implement routine depression screening among older adult patients using the GDS-15. Depressive symptoms were identified, and follow-up and treatment for depression in primary care was initiated if indicated by GDS-15 scores. Data were obtained from the project site's electronic medical record on a total sample size of 443 patients (n = 252 in the comparison group and n = 191 in the implementation group).

resultsA chi-square test indicated a clinical and statistically significant improvement in the identification rate of depression, X2 (1, N = 443) = 49.76,

conclusionsFindings of this project suggest all older adults should receive a depression screening routinely in primary care to increase the recognition of depression as well as follow-up and treatment.

Indexed as

DepressionPrimary Health CareAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansbehavioral healthdepressiongeriatricsprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36760105
PMCPMC9926000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.