Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760083›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

Efficacy comparison of 3CL protease inhibitors ensitrelvir and nirmatrelvir against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and in vivo.

Takayuki Kuroda, Haruaki Nobori, Keita Fukao, Kaoru Baba, Kazumi Matsumoto, Shinpei Yoshida, Yukari Tanaka, Ryosuke Watari, Ryoko Oka, Yasuyuki Kasai and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A SARS-CoV-2 MNature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Discovery of the Clinical CandidateJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takayuki KurodaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Haruaki NoboriPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-0843
Keita FukaoPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Kaoru BabaResearch Area for Drug Candidate Generation II, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Kazumi MatsumotoResearch Area for Drug Candidate Generation II, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Shinpei YoshidaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Yukari TanakaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Ryosuke WatariPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Ryoko OkaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Yasuyuki KasaiPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Kae InoueResearch Area for Drug Candidate Generation II, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Sho KawashimaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Alice ShimbaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Yoko Hayasaki-KajiwaraPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Miki TanimuraPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Qianhui ZhangPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Yuki TachibanaPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-4453
Teruhisa KatoPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5041-0110
Takao ShishidoPharmaceutical Research Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 1-1, Futaba-cho 3-chome, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become established in the human population, making the need to develop safe and effective treatments critical. We have developed the small-molecule antiviral ensitrelvir, which targets the 3C-like (3CL) protease of SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of ensitrelvir compared with that of another SARS-CoV-2 3CL PI, nirmatrelvir.

methodsCultured cells, BALB/cAJcl mice and Syrian hamsters were infected with various SARS-CoV-2 strains, including the ancestral strain WK-521, mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 (MA-P10) strain, Delta strain and Omicron strain. Ensitrelvir efficacy was compared with that of nirmatrelvir. Effective concentrations were determined in vitro based on virus-induced cytopathic effects, viral titres and RNA levels. Lung viral titres, nasal turbinate titres, body-weight changes, and animal survival were also monitored.

resultsEnsitrelvir and nirmatrelvir showed comparable antiviral activity in multiple cell lines. Both ensitrelvir and nirmatrelvir reduced virus levels in the lungs of mice and the nasal turbinates and lungs of hamsters. However, ensitrelvir demonstrated comparable or better in vivo efficacy than that of nirmatrelvir when present at similar or slightly lower unbound-drug plasma concentrations.

conclusionsDirect in vitro and in vivo efficacy comparisons of 3CL PIs revealed that ensitrelvir demonstrated comparable in vitro efficacy to that of nirmatrelvir in cell culture and exhibited equal to or greater in vivo efficacy in terms of unbound-drug plasma concentration in both animal models evaluated. The results suggest that ensitrelvir may become an important resource for treating individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCricetinaeHumansIndazolesProtease InhibitorsTriazinesTriazolesAntiviral AgentsensitrelvirIndazolesProtease InhibitorsTriazinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID36760083
PMCPMC10068418
OpenAlexW4319812243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.