Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36760020›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and planning2024

Exploring economic empowerment and gender issues in Lesotho's Child Grants Programme: a qualitative study.

Elodie Besnier, Thandie Hlabana, Virginia Kotzias, Kathryn Beck, Celine Sieu, Kimanzi Muthengi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elodie BesnierCentre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8900, Torgarden, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-7455
Thandie HlabanaNational University of Lesotho, P.O. Roma 180, Roma, Lesotho.
Virginia KotziasCentre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8900, Torgarden, Trondheim 7491, Norway.
Kathryn BeckCentre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8900, Torgarden, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-4577
Celine SieuUNICEF Lesotho Country Office, 13 UN Road, UN House, Maseru, Lesotho.
Kimanzi MuthengiUNICEF Lesotho Country Office, 13 UN Road, UN House, Maseru, Lesotho.
National University of Lesotho · LSNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

NTNU Department of Sociology and Political Science "Småforsk" strategic research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cash transfers (CTs) have been increasingly used in low- and middle-income countries as a poverty reduction and social protection tool. Despite their potential for empowering vulnerable groups (especially women), the evidence for such outcomes remains unclear. Additionally, little is known about how this broad concept fits into and is perceived in such programmes. For example, Lesotho's Child Grants Programme (CGP) is an unconditional CT targeting poor and vulnerable households with children. The CGP has been presented as one of the Lesotho's flagship programmes in developing the country's social safety net system. Using the CGP's early phases as a case study, this research aims to capture how programme stakeholders understood and operationalized the concept of economic empowerment (especially women's) in Lesotho's CGP. The qualitative analysis relied on the triangulation of information from a review of programme documents and semi-structured key informant interviews with programme stakeholders. First, the programme documents were coded deductively, while the interview transcripts were coded inductively, and then both materials were analysed thematically. Finally, differences or disagreements within each theme were explored individually according to the programme's chronology, the stakeholders' affiliation and their role in the CGP. The complexity of economic empowerment was reflected in the diversity of definitions found in the desk review and interviews. Economic empowerment was primarily understood as improving access to economic resources and opportunities and, less so, as agency and social and economic inclusion. There were stronger disagreements on other definitions as they seemed to be a terminology primarily used by specific stakeholders. This diversity of definitions impacted how these concepts were integrated into the programme, with particular gaps between the strategic vision and operational units as well as between the role this concept was perceived to play and the effects evaluated so far.

Indexed as

EmpowermentSexismChildFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLesothoQualitative ResearchCash transfereconomic empowermentgenderLesothosocial protectionwomen’s empowerment

Identifiers

PMID36760020
PMCPMC11651286
OpenAlexW4319826356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.