Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759816›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Medical students' perception of general practice: a cross-sectional survey.

D H J Pols, A Kamps, J Runhaar, G Elshout, K F van Halewijn, Patrick J E Bindels, K M Stegers-Jager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding of 'generalist medical practice' in South African medical schools.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D H J PolsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. d.pols@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9958-1885
A KampsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J RunhaarDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G ElshoutDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
K F van HalewijnDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick J E BindelsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
K M Stegers-JagerInstitute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increase in the demand for general practitioners is expected in many countries, but only a minority of medical students consider a career in general practice. More detailed and up-to-date knowledge about medical student's perception of general practice would be helpful for efforts to encourage medical students to consider a career in general practice.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional single center survey among Dutch medical students to evaluate their perception of general practice at three different stages in their study: Ba1: first-year bachelor students; Ba3: third-year bachelor students; Ma3: third-year master students. The impact of different factors on their attitudes and perceptions was quantified. A multivariate logistic regression was performed with 'interest in general practice' as the outcome variable.

resultsThe median age for Ba1 was 18 (IQR: 18-19) and 71.5% were female, for Ba3 the median age was 20 (IQR: 20-21) and 70.6% were female and for Ma3 the median age was 25 years (IQR: 24-26) and 73.3% were female. On average, 31.2% of the respondents had a migration background. The mean response rate for this study was 77.1%. Of the participating Ba1 students (n = 340) only 22.4% considered working as a GP after medical school; for Ba3 students (n = 231) this percentage was 33.8%, and for Ma3 students (n = 210) it was significantly higher at 70.5%; in the final multivariate model this corresponded to an odds ratio (OR) of 4.3 (95%-CI:2.6-6.9) compared to Ba1 students. The strongest predictor in the final model was the opinion that general practice provides a pleasant working environment (OR 9.5; 95%-CI: 6.2-14.5).

conclusionThis study showed that multiple factors are significantly related to medical students' interest in general practice. Although students believed that general practice does not have a high status within the medical profession, they acknowledged the social importance and the pleasant working environment of general practice. Knowledge obtained in this study can be used when designing a medical curriculum or a general practice course.

Indexed as

General PracticeStudents, MedicalAdultCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCareer choiceGeneral practiceMedical educationMedical studentsUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID36759816
PMCPMC9912627
OpenAlexW4319662654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.