ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Long-term effects of combined brilliant blue G and xenon light induced retinal toxicity following macular hole repair surgery.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal architecture as a determinant of brilliant blue G phototoxicity during internal limiting membrane peeling: A case series.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Choroidal changes after vitrectomy performed for macular hole retinal detachment.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Supervised machine learning statistical models for visual outcome prediction in macular hole surgery: a single-surgeon, standardized surgery study.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of pre-operative findings and post-operative outcomes in primary and secondary macular holes at a tertiary eye hospital in South India.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to look at the long-term effects of retinal phototoxicity after macular hole repair surgery using xenon endolight illumination and Brilliant blue G (BBG) dye. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly man in his late seventies underwent para plana vitrectomy with BBG dye to repair an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (MH) in his right eye. Prior to macular hole surgery, his visual acuity in the right eye was 6/60, N24 at the time of presentation. The MH closed with type 1 closure immediately after surgery, but there was extensive damage to the outer retinal layers and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) at the macula, resulting in a reduction in visual acuity to 2/60. We presumed that the combination of BBG and xenon light, is the probable reason of retinotoxicity in the current patient. There was a progressive increase in the area of retinal and RPE layer damage and choroidal thinning over a 4-year period.
conclusionDue to combined BBG-induced dye and endoilluminator toxicity, a rare case of continuously progressing RPE layer damage with choroidal thinning over a long follow-up interval was described. Such long-term effects of BBG and endolight induced retinotoxicity have not been reported in the literature, to the best of our knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.