Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759766›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2023

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility randomized control trial.

Todd Tran, Catherine Donnelly, Emily Nalder, Tracy Trothen, Marcia Finlayson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03867474 (Mixed-methods, Feasibility Randomized Control Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03867474 naunknown statusnot on this map

Mixed-methods, Feasibility Randomized Control Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) With Older Adults Living With Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a Primary Care Context

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsFeasibility Randomized Control TrialArmsMindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Todd TranSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. Todd.Tran@wchospital.ca.
Catherine DonnellySchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Emily NalderDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Tracy TrothenJointly appointed to the School of Rehabilitation Therapy and School of Religion (Theological Hall), Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Marcia FinlaysonSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is often the first point of contact when community-dwelling older adults experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Living with SCD or MCI can be life-altering, resulting in low mood and increased anxiety, further exacerbating cognitive decline. However, there is scant literature on interventions that interprofessional primary care providers can provide to support those living with SCD or MCI. Practicing mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in an interprofessional primary care setting may support emotional health and well-being for those with cognitive decline, but it has not been studied in an interprofessional primary care context.

objectivesThis study's primary aim was to determine the feasibility of, and perceived benefits to and satisfaction with, a 9-Week MBSR program delivered in a team-based primary care setting. The secondary aim was to examine the acceptability of using technology (computer tablet and App Insight Timer®) for program delivery and home practice.

methodsA convergent mixed-methods, single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study design was used. A quantitative strand was used to evaluate the feasibility of the MBSR program. The qualitative strand used a focus group with older adult participants with SCD or MCI. Individual semi-structured interviews with occupational therapists who are qualified-MBSR teachers were conducted to explore the acceptability of using computer tablets for program delivery and home practice.

results27 participants were randomized (14 MBSR; 13 Control) with retention rates of 64.3% (9/14 completed ≥6 sessions), true adherence rates of 50% (7/14 met ≥19.5 hrs of home practice), 21.4% attrition rates, and 100% post-intervention follow-up. No participants who used computer tablets at the beginning of the intervention switched to low technology. Older adult participants found the use of computer tablets in the MBSR course acceptable and appreciated the portability of the tablets.

conclusionsBased on the lower-than-expected rates of recruitment, retention, and adherence, our study, as designed, did not meet the feasibility benchmarks that were set. However, with minor modifications to the design, including changing how participants who drop-out are analyzed, extending recruitment, and adding multiple sites, this intervention would be well suited to further study using a full-scale RCT. However, we found that embedding MBSR in an interprofessional primary care setting was feasible in practice and qualitative data highlighted the satisfaction and perceived benefits based on the intervention. The use of technology was acceptable and portable, as participants utilized their computer tablets consistently until the study's end. Our study showed that older adults living with SCD or MCI were highly receptive to learning how to use technology, and future group intervention programs in interprofessional primary care settings may also incorporate tablet use.

trial registrationThis study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Board in Toronto, Ontario, Canada (REB# 2017-0056-E); Queen's University (REB# 6026418) in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and Clinicaltrials.gov (08/03/2019; NCT03867474).

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMindfulnessAgedFeasibility StudiesHumansIndependent LivingOntarioPrimary Health CareStress, PsychologicalInterprofessional primary careMild cognitive impairmentMindfulnessOccupational therapySubjective cognitive declineTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36759766
PMCPMC9912594
OpenAlexW4319730617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.