Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36759746›Full record

ReviewLab animal2023

A mapping review of refinements to laboratory rat housing and husbandry.

Vikki Neville, James Lind, Elsa Mendl, Nathalie E Cozma, Elizabeth S Paul, Michael Mendl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research Animal Behavioral Management Programs for the 21st Century.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vikki NevilleAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. vikki.neville@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-1353
James LindAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-2814
Elsa MendlAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nathalie E CozmaAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth S PaulAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael MendlAnimal Welfare and Behaviour Research Group, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-1871

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T002654/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refining the housing and husbandry of laboratory rats is an important goal, both for ethical reasons and to allow better quality research. We conducted a mapping review of 1,017 studies investigating potential refinements of housing and husbandry of the laboratory rat to assess what refinements have, and have not, been studied, and to briefly assess whether there is evidence to support any impact on rat welfare. Among the many refinements studied, the majority involve changes to the cage, but some also involve alterations to the wider environment. The effects of these refinements were assessed using a range of readouts, many of which are difficult to interpret from a welfare perspective. Preference studies, which are easier to interpret, provide evidence that rats prefer complex environments, including shelters and multiple objects, which offer different areas/resources allowing the rat to engage in diverse behaviors. The reporting of methodology in papers was often poor, indicating that studies were potentially subject to biases. Given that many refinements co-occurred, it was often difficult to tease apart which ones were most beneficial for rat welfare. Effects of refinements were also moderated by a number of factors including age, sex, strain and photoperiod. Altogether our findings show that a one-size-fits-all approach to refinements is not appropriate, because different refinements will impact different rats in different ways. Our review has also produced a database of >1,000 articles that can be used for further and more detailed analyses. Our findings have also highlighted areas where future research is likely to be valuable, including refinements to rat transport, handling and the use of training.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHousing, AnimalRats

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.