ArticleScientific reports2023
Functional outcome after pediatric cerebral cavernous malformation surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare cause of persistent hiccups: familial cerebral cavernous malformations associated with mutation of the KRIT1 gene.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) for paediatric intracranial cavernous malformations: case series and review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Clinical and molecular landscape of paediatric cerebral and spinal cavernous malformations.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Outcomes after surgical and nonsurgical treatment of pediatric cerebral cavernous malformation.Pediatric investigation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional outcome following surgical resection of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) in pediatric patients. We screened our institutional database of CCM patients treated between 2003 and 2021. Inclusion regarded individuals younger or equal than 18 years of age with complete clinical baseline characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging dataset, and postoperative follow-up time of at least three months. Functional outcome was quantified using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and assessed at admission, discharge, and last follow-up examination. The primary endpoint was the postoperative functional outcome. As a secondary endpoint, predictors of postoperative functional deterioration were assessed. A total of 49 pediatric patients with a mean age of 11.3 ± 5.7 years were included for subsequent analyses. Twenty individuals (40.8%) were female. Complete resection of the lesion was achieved in 44 patients (89.8%), and two patients with incomplete resection were referred for successive remnant removal. The mean follow-up time after surgery was 44 months (IQR: 13 - 131). The mean mRS score was 1.6 on admission, 1.7 at discharge, and 0.9 at the latest follow-up. Logistic regression analysis adjusted to age and sex identified brainstem localization (aOR = 53.45 [95%CI = 2.26 - 1261.81], p = .014) as a predictor of postoperative deterioration. This study indicates that CCM removal in children can be regarded as safe and favorable for the majority of patients, depending on lesion localization. Brainstem localization implies a high risk of postoperative morbidity and indication for surgery should be balanced carefully. Minor evidence indicates that second-look surgery for CCM remnants might be safe and favorable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.